None:
Polyps:
Strongs:

The Promises Of The Serpent

What were the promises of the serpent? Simply as follows;

Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

Clearly the first promise for the majority of mankind that chooses not to be saved, and search for the correct God is false: Many surely have died. The possibility of redemption at a later time may have been implied by "not surely die" although God, in excluding them from redemption in the form of the tree of life ensured that they indeed surely did die.

The second promise that their eyes were opened is correct: They were opened to the fact that they were now become evil - that they were naked and ashamed before the goodness of God, they hid from him - hardly the result of something "to be desired to make one wise".

The third promise, that they become as gods, knowing good and evil is false: rather the serpent stated that they would be able to decide for themselves what rules of good and evil they would hold to, as of their own invention. They knew after that only God is good and they were evil. Their evil found their place in disobedience to just one commandment: there was no other thing good after the commandment was broken. There was no possibility in keeping other divine commandments for them to rationalise a state of obedience to show any "divine goodness" - there was no covenant with God which they could approach Him in. They could no longer "know" good, they only knew that "good" was broken.

As to their being "as gods", They do not get to choose the difference between God's commandments and their own will: They had broken the good commandment of God; any rules they were to conjure up over their own children would not be as righteous as God's own was. It was absolute, theirs is relative and now untethered to the approval of the true God. They are not "gods" even in the event that they were to hold true to any system of laws of their own making.

So how do these promises hold up to the practice of the dialectic method today?

The pride that the church is in favour with God (although God has left it in favour of a small remnant outside of the church's practices with the dialectic) clearly excludes the church from "eternal life" - the dialectic practices of many animate the image of the church system as to the overarching image set up by the church (the false prophet) when it comes to examine where it wants to ride the beast - rather than where to go to obey God. The revelation describes this in detail.

The church clearly is formed of individuals that call themselves sinners redeemed: They have justified their own dialectic practices with the assertion that they sin, yet the whole is sinless; that they may play the beast's paramour (the image) with the process over the whole body of Christ. (Including riding the beast over the true elect that are separate) and find satisfaction in the approval of the group-church whole rather than the individual approval of God. The result is that the church is "saved always saved" whilst every member of the church is not. Can anyone else see the inconsistency?

As to becoming "as gods" The church that exports the dialectic process is in fact exporting the mark of the beast, whilst holding to the name of the beast and under the image: acting in the number of his name. The verses of 2Thessalonians Ch.2 put it best.

2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

This individual is without doubt the manipulator that performs all such mental somersaults, knowing the falsity of the process but pushing it like a drug down the throats of new pastures, bringing churches from under God into a position of approval (As a mark between thine eyes and in the right hand) by the beast, deriving the freedom to worship not just from the beast, but the method of determining the truth of doctrine within the method of the image to the beast set up by the false prophet (of the church itself that exports the mark). The intent is all to promote growth or unity in the faith where there is no unity - just more association under the methods of the dialectic, copied from government present in the scarlet beast.

In opposing and exalting himself over God he sets up himself in place of the coset of K4, shifting the unity to manipulate the dialectic "four horsemen" of the revelations seals, and manages "the truth" rather than the paperwork. He sets himself up as mediator between the system of satan and the church, in clear violation of not just God's commandments but in clear conflict with the faith of any item of reverence, treating absolute truth and the sanctity of faith as if it were nothing. Then placing the method of the dialectic balances in the vacuum created; all the while seducing those in the room with the atmosphere that something is working to the benefit of all, whereas the result is to titillate the carnal nature of the crowd mentality. Truly, as exporting the mark of the beast to the fellowship - he has shown himself to be the emissary of the devil.


Continue To Next Page

Return To Section Start

Return To Previous Page