Lust Of The Flesh

Accessing Strongs Dictionary...


Bible Tools Metaphysics Metamath Creationism Revelation The Gospels Commentary
Creationism Who And What Is God? Introduction Who And What Is God? Who And What Are We? The Greatest Lie Of Satan By The Same Word The Lexis And The Lucis The Creation Account Introduction An Entry Point Into The Creation Account Let There Be Spacetime Past, Present And Future Apparent Rapid Expansion And A Big Bang Plants Without Gravity Or Electromagnetism? No Plants On The Third Day Two Great Lights, Gravity & Electromagnetism Creatures And Fowl From The Waters Cattle Lead To Men To Keep Them Made In The Image Of God What Are The Chances? Introduction Objections To Evolution Seven Days And Not Seven Ages The Deep No Water Jacket For The Earth A Mist To Water The Ground Why Plants Are Not Alive To God The Order Of The Addition Of Life Any Alien Life Elsewhere? The Flood And A Change Of Physics God Is Still Active Introduction The Ark Of His Testament The Flood In The Days Of Noah Where Did Mrs Cain Come From? God Chooses To Be Involved The Fall Of Man The Garden, Was It There? Freedom And Disobedience The Fall Was Universal The Curse Of Death, The Sting Of Sin The Serpent Spake Introduction The Dialectic Vs. The Didactic The Dialectic - The Beguiling Of Eve The Didactic - The Tempatation Of Christ Luciferian Philosophy 2001 - A Space Odyssey The Osirian Cycle All Judgment Given To Christ Ordo Ab Chao Lust Of The Eyes Lust Of The Flesh The Pride Of Life Dialectics Invalidate Dialectics Introduction The Fixed Viewpoint Of Identity The Paradigm Shift To Identity The Limit Of Contradiction To The Left Or Right (Freedom) Dialectic Convergence To Synthesis The Eradication Of Faith The Flesh - The Strength Of Sin The Promises Of The Serpent The Reward Of God Dialectic Logic Introduction The Success Of The Dialectic Logical AND Logical NOT Logical OR Logical XOR Naive Set Theory Do Numbers Lie? Greeks, Time And Commensurability The Dialectic Method In Research Like Unto The Most High? Introduction God And Subgroup Addition Like Unto The Most High? Left, Right, Somewhere In The Middle A Proverb Against Babylon Hurting The Oil And The Wine Back In The Saddle Again Dialectic Chaos The God Of This World I Didn't Put My Name To That! The Lake Of Fire Introduction The Trumpets To Wormwood The Four Beasts The Three Woes - The Unholy Trinity A Brief Mystery Of Time The Restrainer The Great Tribulation Three Spirits As Frogs The Way Of The Kings Of The East The Lake Of Fire Written In Black And White Determinism And Predestination Introduction It Is Not In Man To Direct His Steps The Uncertainty Principle Higher Than Your Ways The Purpose Of Iniquity The Predestination Checklist Approaching Pleasure, Avoiding Pain The Tower Of Babel Introduction The Biblical Account A Centre Of Learning The Group Dynamic The Question Of Power Corrupt? Absolutely Some Odds And Ends Introduction Dinosaurs In The Book Of Job Science Is Not Irrelevant The Dangers Of Literalism Is This Some Sort Of Joke? Faith In The Face Of The Evidence - So Called Science Ultrafilters And Creation (ZPE?) Infinite Descent Introduction Good Creators, Redeemable Creation If God Has A Creator As Long As It Takes Every Device Of Evil Overcome The Enemy Is Justified? No Argument Of Infinite Descent All Creators Agree One Redeemer Of All The Argument Against Infinite Descent	Lust Of The Flesh The lust of the flesh is a great deal harder to formulate: but we continue on regardless. We may simply equate the senses to a machine, which when someone cranks the handle will check every possible combination of the various orderings of the five (or less) senses to see whether there is found a response for pleasure, or a response for pain. This machine we will place in the timeline between the statements of the inverses of the "lust of the eyes" as prior. If at the end of the process the machine may have internally reordered itself, but is not broken - it still works then we assume that dopamine is released and the latter stage of the lust of the eyes, "It was a cake" and "I like cake!" follows in a manner as before and the synthesis of "do as thou wilt" again resumes. This machine is a funny one, it doesnt respond the way most people would think it should. It has two gears, high and low: The one gear on "high" is such that the response is to let the machine run without any release of dopamine, and "low" with dopamine released on the basis that whether the machine came out with the result "will be nice" or "will be bad" the dopamine is still released. The machine acts as as an amplifier of sorts, so that betwen the statements of the "lust of the eyes" timeline, the machine will increase the worth of the statement "tastes cake" as well as the statement "I like cake!", as well as decrease the negative worth of the statements "takes cake" and "it was a cake". The result is that the machine works in the fashion that when the machine is on high gear the mind will merely be tempted, and whilst on low gear the machine will attempt to "seduce" the sinner with dopamine into eating someone elses cake. If one were to imagine this machine full of gears, on low gear half of the cogs are used and on high gear all the ocgs are used. On low gear the machine is capable of doing all the function of the high gear, but at a greater cost of dopamine: such is the case that the mind becomes less capable of recreating the dopamine to supply the low gear (after a while) and so automatically works on high gear with what has become familiar to the eater of cake. The high gear runs with a lower use of dopamine, and is the norm; yet the low gear is fashioned to guide the lust of the eyes into pleasure and to avoid pain. The internal workings are also important. The low gear's cogs that take up half the room will seem to justify the choice of any particular "lust of the eyes". No matter which of the senses are tested, the machine automatically detects the senses used and switches appropriately to a better internal set of "timings". A reversal of "see-taste" as with our cake might become "touch-smell" if one likes garden rosemary for example; The machine can adjust its timings appropriately so that every possible combination of the senses may run to the eventual preservation of the "synthesis" that "it was a cake" and "I like cake" is all the justification someone ever needs: How do they know they like cake? Because the machine has reinforced that they do from the very first moment they tried cake. The machine is very easy to confuse: elements of "lust of the eyes" must be wrapped about the machine so they unwind in reverse order as to how they were lined up before the machine in the timeline. temp1 => tempt2 => tempt3 => machine => excuse 3 => excuse 2 => excuse 1. (There are many more than four temptations and excuses if you are actually wondering.) If the elements are not so wrapped in properly unwinding order, the timings of the machine get confused; the outcome is not necessarily pleasure; but may be such as so it prints out a message of requirement - it can ask for a "fix" of something else to rebalance the timings. If you are interested there is a mathematical explanation of the machine in the metamath section. It is based on the simple subgroup A5 of S5. I compare it when factored down by the tempting "transposition" and wrapped in the same, followed by any such similar conjugation of any list of transpositions as inverses. That A5 is simple of degree five does the rest. It is fundamental to understanding the manner of "life" that the false prophet animates the image to the beast with. (See revelation). Continue To Next Page Return To Section Start Return To Previous Page