The Tail Of The Dragon Is Constructed

We have seen the "bow" and "crown" of the rider of the white horse,.. but there is more to come. These first four seals are comprised of the static subgroup with the right hand element and a particular choice of unity. The "antichrist" within the left hand that is subsequent does not have K4 group structure but can "leech" properties in opposition to the arrangement of the right hand octal. That is, we may have two possible bows, then three, then a final fourth. This three onto one construct to the fourth stage can in the right hand be likened to the symmetries of the four colour plane graph as previously,.. whilst in the left hand without the octal operations we see the mystery of iniquity take shape.

Remember - these triples in the left hand do not have octal operation as their structure, though they do leech their properties from the right hand.

So with this in mind, lets have a fresh look at these verses again.

Rev 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. (KJV)

I expect each of the four beasts before the throne full of eyes within, (to which John looks within) express the whole sum total of the levels of temptation, sin, human arrogance and the amount of all iniquity across the whole of time respectively. By identifying the cause of the sin, the desire to be in rapture to government; the type of sin; to be a "church" so divided there is no true doctrine held fast, to have been made thus out of arrogance, and for this to be occurring at the very limit of God's temperance is a dreadful thing indeed.

Let us approach the second seal.

Rev 6:4 And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword. (KJV)

Now, if we open the second seal, so that now instead of "a=1" we have "c=1" and we keep (b,d,f) fixed as before, (we unseal an identity as floating, or a position within the 144 = 6*24 octal 'reversals' - opening a seal on the "book of life" (that also contains the 24 elders) associated with the map to unity of the sun octal) We have another horse go out, this time with a complement subgroup and a different octal for the left hand, that generated by (a,e,g).

So, if these spiritual "identities" both have "crowns", they can not both have the property that they are fixed. They can not both be unity unless the elements "a" and "c" are equal. The "peace" or status quo that a = c (and there remaining only one rider) can be removed from the earth when these two clash. (in fact there is only one rider - antichrist) These two oppose each other and do not share the same seven triples in the left hand.

Now, if we hold to the syntax we have used throughout revelation, we can explain how these two represent conflict.

By "they should kill one another" we mean to be that they should cancel each other out. if we take a = (c,e,g) and c = (a,e,g) then we may substitute one into the other.

a = (c,e,g) = ((a,e,g),e,g) = a. (I.e. we require that eg,eg may "cancel") thus "c" is killed when "a" "falls upon him", but this operation is "given" rather than a property inherited. This is not an octal operation - it is a consequence of symmetry when we move from one octal to another, from one left hand to a second.

Then we may consider cross substitutions as "crossing swords" or that somehow "c" falls upon "a" and then they cancel each other.

Where else do we see a great sword used in revelation? We see that Christ has a great two edged sword which comes out of His mouth,.. and that these cut off the two parts of the K4 ultrafilter that are not identity or "rest" states. Likewise the great sword for each of these antichrist riders (with their crowns) is {e,g,e,g} and are therefore cut off accordingly as these two antichrist spirits mimic Christ. The sword has to be GIVEN to these horsemen from their octals. We see that there is a deliberate attempt to circumvent the operations of the ultrafilter here. All we minimally require is that e.g. + e.g. = 0.

Now let us approach the third seal.

Rev 6:5 And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
Rev 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. (KJV)

Again, we shift identities so that (b,d,f) is fixed as before but now "e" = 1. Our complement subgroup is now (a,c,g)

Consider the following that we have accumulated so far. We now have three subgroups in different left hand octals, each with a crown, each opposed to each other in pairs, a situation that requires a resolution to the conflict. This has accumulated to the opposition to the spirit of grace which is the dialectic process of "dialogue"

Now we have from the original octal of the right hand that either a=1 or c=1 or e=1. In the right hand these correspond to positions of the 144 octal reversals formed by the six possible choices of unity similar to the 24 elders but not "as the throne" or "sun" but equally valid in "the sea" - (as a measure of wheat) , each "anointed" with oil for kingship or a crown and each in receipt of a reward for their labour of a "penny" (as if "unity") which is their rest in Christ. The term "hurt not the oil" then becomes to not confuse the concept of the penny, which in this case belongs to e = 1 = (a,e,g) (a penny has no worth to the singletons of the left hand, but only to their triples)

Hurting the oil and the wine corresponds to the choice of the two remaining triples for the synthesis of the two sides (scales) of the balances. Using both switches the roles of oil and wine, and is structurally contradictory - not confusing these concepts is not to "hurt" the process of the balances. Also, the choice of those two (oil and wine) depends on whatever one of the two the carnal man in the system (as the life in the image) is geared - to accept the compromise (wine) rather than to stay in the fixed position (the oil). The mechanism of "approach pleasure, avoid pain" will choose the wine as preferable to the oil in each case, (one is preferable sensually to the other)

So the wheat,.. one of "a" or "c" or "e" (from the right hand) is a penny (unity) and three measures of barley (from the left hand) e.g. one of (c,e,g) or (a,e,g) or (a,c,g) (having three triples each from the left hand). is also fixed (has a penny)

The "wine" or the intersection of these three; "g" is not hurt,.. it is the wine at the table that these three meet at for dialogue. (a cup of wine at every position of the table) There is a similarity then to blood throughout revelation which is commonly the "intersection" of subgroups.

So we may position the groups (horses) on a set of balances as follows.

Now, we may lighten the scales by our unity (e) which is the "oil" in this case. removing the "e" from both sides gives us accordingly...

In terms of dialog, this requires that those in conflict remove from the table everything they agree upon and only compare what they have left over. (It is not what they disagree upon that they argue over, but that manner in which they agree upon the "unity", the manner in which they hold their position - that is the difference between them).

In order to absorb unity we must be employing the multiplication in the right hand: and that unity is associated with the facilitator's bow. (Shown here at the base of the balances). It is curious that those other two "bows" in the scales form the non-wine elements of the base: They would have cross-substituted (slain) each other were it not for the position of the facilitator and the absorption of the unity element.

The black horse (a,c,g) = e = 1 facilitates this process. That which all three agree upon (the wine) is upon the table still, but the irreconcilable difference is that which they have in similarity, removing this is forcing a compromise. The position of the facilitator is then to arrive at the synthesis of (c,e,g) and (a,e,g). By removing the "oil" or the anointing for the receipt of a penny by absorbing the unity into cg and ag We then find a synthesis {acg}. g is not "opposed to the synthesis" - remember these are not groups but sets and leeched properties of the right hand.

This three way orientation will work for each of the first three horsemen in the role of the facilitator, and is a three way dialectic balance of thesis/antithesis = synthesis

Now the fourth seal.

Rev 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. (KJV)

Once more we move our identity. with g=1 and (b,d,f) fixed we have a final "horse". (a,c,e).

Comparing to the other three horsemen shows us little.

a = 1 = (c,e,g)
c = 1 = (a,e,g)
e = 1 = (a,c,g)
g = 1 = (a,c,e)

Seals one to three may work for any choice of three horses from this list. (It is the limit here though). We see that the rider on the horse is the closure of the set, the "wheat" being the wine on the table of the other three horses or "sets of barley."

What we see then is that when we include all four seals each horse becomes equivalent to the other three. If we choose a = 1 then in product ceg = 1, or from the other three (eg)(cg)(ce)=1.

likewise if then a = 1 = (c,e,g) is a bow then so are the remaining three horsemen since "a" is fixed and c=>e=>g within each horse.. Thus the pale horse is "hidden" within the other three. This system is then separate from Christ altogether.

Since Christ is sat at the right hand of God, we can consider the opening of these four seals as corresponding directly to the four beasts about the throne. The closure of the four horsemen as a system within these four beasts corresponds to the "fourth part of the Earth" - dominion within or up to the fourth beast as before the throne if you like. As Christ is life, and this seal is enough to separate one from Christ, (albeit with a fourth "closure" of a simple rule of thumb rather than an actual operation) this rider is therefore named "Death" (note the capitalisation of a proper name.) The rider on the horse, Death, is antichrist.

Hell follows with antichrist in the manner spoken. Hell is this fourfold system of dialectics rather than the fourth horsemen which is the severing spirit turning away from the life in Christ. Hell must be life within this fourfold system of dialectics, it is slavery under a second death (of the spirit.) Men may be placed into hell with sword (violence - 2nd horseman), with hunger (without the true wine or bread of heaven, using the dialectic without truth, 3rd horsemen), with death (the 4th horsemen - capitulation to the result of dialogue - the sin of Adam), or by the beasts (governments) of the world. This is a crucial stipulation that artificial human beings may take the place of the horsemen, (i.e. a corporation).

Each of these may be summed up in the phrase "Those that will kill you will think they do God service." The "crown on the head" of antichrist is the reason why the four horsemen do what they do (spiritually kill as if they were God). They have no dominion over Christ at all however.

So, the dragons tail has been constructed. In Jesus' day it was present through the four sequentially listed parts of the statue in Nebuchadnezzar's dream. Each stage of

The Tail Of The Dragon Is Constructed

We have seen the "bow" and "crown" of the rider of the white horse,.. but there is more to come. These first four seals are comprised of the static subgroup with the right hand element and a particular choice of unity. The "antichrist" within the left hand that is subsequent does not have K4 group structure but can "leech" properties in opposition to the arrangement of the right hand octal. That is, we may have two possible bows, then three, then a final fourth. This three onto one construct to the fourth stage can in the right hand be likened to the symmetries of the four colour plane graph as previously,.. whilst in the left hand without the octal operations we see the mystery of iniquity take shape.

Remember - these triples in the left hand do not have octal operation as their structure, though they do leech their properties from the right hand.

So with this in mind, lets have a fresh look at these verses again.

Rev 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. (KJV)

I expect each of the four beasts before the throne full of eyes within, (to which John looks within) express the whole sum total of the levels of temptation, sin, human arrogance and the amount of all iniquity across the whole of time respectively. By identifying the cause of the sin, the desire to be in rapture to government; the type of sin; to be a "church" so divided there is no true doctrine held fast, to have been made thus out of arrogance, and for this to be occurring at the very limit of God's temperance is a dreadful thing indeed.

Let us approach the second seal.

Rev 6:4 And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword. (KJV)

Now, if we open the second seal, so that now instead of "a=1" we have "c=1" and we keep (b,d,f) fixed as before, (we unseal an identity as floating, or a position within the 144 = 6*24 octal 'reversals' - opening a seal on the "book of life" (that also contains the 24 elders) associated with the map to unity of the sun octal) We have another horse go out, this time with a complement subgroup and a different octal for the left hand, that generated by (a,e,g).

So, if these spiritual "identities" both have "crowns", they can not both have the property that they are fixed. They can not both be unity unless the elements "a" and "c" are equal. The "peace" or status quo that a = c (and there remaining only one rider) can be removed from the earth when these two clash. (in fact there is only one rider - antichrist) These two oppose each other and do not share the same seven triples in the left hand.

Now, if we hold to the syntax we have used throughout revelation, we can explain how these two represent conflict.

By "they should kill one another" we mean to be that they should cancel each other out. if we take a = (c,e,g) and c = (a,e,g) then we may substitute one into the other.

a = (c,e,g) = ((a,e,g),e,g) = a. (I.e. we require that eg,eg may "cancel") thus "c" is killed when "a" "falls upon him", but this operation is "given" rather than a property inherited. This is not an octal operation - it is a consequence of symmetry when we move from one octal to another, from one left hand to a second.

Then we may consider cross substitutions as "crossing swords" or that somehow "c" falls upon "a" and then they cancel each other.

Where else do we see a great sword used in revelation? We see that Christ has a great two edged sword which comes out of His mouth,.. and that these cut off the two parts of the K4 ultrafilter that are not identity or "rest" states. Likewise the great sword for each of these antichrist riders (with their crowns) is {e,g,e,g} and are therefore cut off accordingly as these two antichrist spirits mimic Christ. The sword has to be GIVEN to these horsemen from their octals. We see that there is a deliberate attempt to circumvent the operations of the ultrafilter here. All we minimally require is that e.g. + e.g. = 0.

Now let us approach the third seal.

Rev 6:5 And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
Rev 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. (KJV)

Again, we shift identities so that (b,d,f) is fixed as before but now "e" = 1. Our complement subgroup is now (a,c,g)

Consider the following that we have accumulated so far. We now have three subgroups in different left hand octals, each with a crown, each opposed to each other in pairs, a situation that requires a resolution to the conflict. This has accumulated to the opposition to the spirit of grace which is the dialectic process of "dialogue"

Now we have from the original octal of the right hand that either a=1 or c=1 or e=1. In the right hand these correspond to positions of the 144 octal reversals formed by the six possible choices of unity similar to the 24 elders but not "as the throne" or "sun" but equally valid in "the sea" - (as a measure of wheat) , each "anointed" with oil for kingship or a crown and each in receipt of a reward for their labour of a "penny" (as if "unity") which is their rest in Christ. The term "hurt not the oil" then becomes to not confuse the concept of the penny, which in this case belongs to e = 1 = (a,e,g) (a penny has no worth to the singletons of the left hand, but only to their triples)

Hurting the oil and the wine corresponds to the choice of the two remaining triples for the synthesis of the two sides (scales) of the balances. Using both switches the roles of oil and wine, and is structurally contradictory - not confusing these concepts is not to "hurt" the process of the balances. Also, the choice of those two (oil and wine) depends on whatever one of the two the carnal man in the system (as the life in the image) is geared - to accept the compromise (wine) rather than to stay in the fixed position (the oil). The mechanism of "approach pleasure, avoid pain" will choose the wine as preferable to the oil in each case, (one is preferable sensually to the other)

So the wheat,.. one of "a" or "c" or "e" (from the right hand) is a penny (unity) and three measures of barley (from the left hand) e.g. one of (c,e,g) or (a,e,g) or (a,c,g) (having three triples each from the left hand). is also fixed (has a penny)

The "wine" or the intersection of these three; "g" is not hurt,.. it is the wine at the table that these three meet at for dialogue. (a cup of wine at every position of the table) There is a similarity then to blood throughout revelation which is commonly the "intersection" of subgroups.

So we may position the groups (horses) on a set of balances as follows.

Now, we may lighten the scales by our unity (e) which is the "oil" in this case. removing the "e" from both sides gives us accordingly...

In terms of dialog, this requires that those in conflict remove from the table everything they agree upon and only compare what they have left over. (It is not what they disagree upon that they argue over, but that manner in which they agree upon the "unity", the manner in which they hold their position - that is the difference between them).

In order to absorb unity we must be employing the multiplication in the right hand: and that unity is associated with the facilitator's bow. (Shown here at the base of the balances). It is curious that those other two "bows" in the scales form the non-wine elements of the base: They would have cross-substituted (slain) each other were it not for the position of the facilitator and the absorption of the unity element.

The black horse (a,c,g) = e = 1 facilitates this process. That which all three agree upon (the wine) is upon the table still, but the irreconcilable difference is that which they have in similarity, removing this is forcing a compromise. The position of the facilitator is then to arrive at the synthesis of (c,e,g) and (a,e,g). By removing the "oil" or the anointing for the receipt of a penny by absorbing the unity into cg and ag We then find a synthesis {acg}. g is not "opposed to the synthesis" - remember these are not groups but sets and leeched properties of the right hand.

This three way orientation will work for each of the first three horsemen in the role of the facilitator, and is a three way dialectic balance of thesis/antithesis = synthesis

Now the fourth seal.

Rev 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. (KJV)

Once more we move our identity. with g=1 and (b,d,f) fixed we have a final "horse". (a,c,e).

Comparing to the other three horsemen shows us little.

a = 1 = (c,e,g)
c = 1 = (a,e,g)
e = 1 = (a,c,g)
g = 1 = (a,c,e)

Seals one to three may work for any choice of three horses from this list. (It is the limit here though). We see that the rider on the horse is the closure of the set, the "wheat" being the wine on the table of the other three horses or "sets of barley."

What we see then is that when we include all four seals each horse becomes equivalent to the other three. If we choose a = 1 then in product ceg = 1, or from the other three (eg)(cg)(ce)=1.

likewise if then a = 1 = (c,e,g) is a bow then so are the remaining three horsemen since "a" is fixed and c=>e=>g within each horse.. Thus the pale horse is "hidden" within the other three. This system is then separate from Christ altogether.

Since Christ is sat at the right hand of God, we can consider the opening of these four seals as corresponding directly to the four beasts about the throne. The closure of the four horsemen as a system within these four beasts corresponds to the "fourth part of the Earth" - dominion within or up to the fourth beast as before the throne if you like. As Christ is life, and this seal is enough to separate one from Christ, (albeit with a fourth "closure" of a simple rule of thumb rather than an actual operation) this rider is therefore named "Death" (note the capitalisation of a proper name.) The rider on the horse, Death, is antichrist.

Hell follows with antichrist in the manner spoken. Hell is this fourfold system of dialectics rather than the fourth horsemen which is the severing spirit turning away from the life in Christ. Hell must be life within this fourfold system of dialectics, it is slavery under a second death (of the spirit.) Men may be placed into hell with sword (violence - 2nd horseman), with hunger (without the true wine or bread of heaven, using the dialectic without truth, 3rd horsemen), with death (the 4th horsemen - capitulation to the result of dialogue - the sin of Adam), or by the beasts (governments) of the world. This is a crucial stipulation that artificial human beings may take the place of the horsemen, (i.e. a corporation).

Each of these may be summed up in the phrase "Those that will kill you will think they do God service." The "crown on the head" of antichrist is the reason why the four horsemen do what they do (spiritually kill as if they were God). They have no dominion over Christ at all however.

So, the dragons tail has been constructed. In Jesus' day it was present through the four sequentially listed parts of the statue in Nebuchadnezzar's dream. Each stage of the four horsemen was constructed sequentially through time (in those kingdoms) so that Rome was "ready to devour the Christ" as the fourth or final part. Similarly today the four horsemen have been sequentially constructed; though in a manner where the four horsemen are "coexistent": They have been arrayed together to overlap in a three onto one device to construct the kingdom of antichrist. (The pale horse amalgam). This is done in mimicry of the "lamb as slain" cutting off of two parts in the octal. We see this in Daniel's vision as the little horn before whom were three horns of the ten plucked up.

These four parts correspond to the four beasts of Daniel's vision - In John's vision the fourth beast is a construction of the previous three. The final part of this fourth amalgamated beast has a deadly wound that is healed with the image made to the beast. This image is a fifth dialectic; "Hell" which takes the place of the "fourth" part or "Death" that is not constructed.

The result is that the scarlet beast vision we see with the judgement in revelation is the intent of the mystery of iniquity: not the actual thing that satan is permitted to construct (due to the deadly wound). It is a patched up copy that due to those days being cut short, will be satan's last losing attempt of jealousy.

These four parts correspond to the four beasts of Daniel's vision - In John's vision the fourth beast is a construction of the previous three. The final part of this fourth amalgamated beast has a deadly wound that is healed with the image made to the beast. This image is a fifth dialectic; "Hell" which takes the place of the "fourth" part or "Death" that is not constructed.

The result is that the scarlet beast vision we see with the judgement in revelation is the intent of the mystery of iniquity: not the actual thing that satan is permitted to construct (due to the deadly wound). It is a patched up copy that due to those days being cut short, will be satan's last losing attempt of jealousy.

Continue To Next Page

Return To Section Start

Return To Previous Page